Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Triton Tech of Texas, LLC v. Nintendo of America Inc. et al, No. 2:10-cv-00328 (E.D. Tex. June 6, 2012)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:10-cv-00328, Dkt. No. 98
Decided
June 6, 2012
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - the court DENIES dft's Motion to Transfer Venue to the Northern District of California
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Transfer V enue to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California (Dkt. No . 91 ) (the “Renewed Motion”) . Having carefully considered the parties’ written submissions, the Court DENIES the Motion. II. FACTS & PROCEDURAL POSTURE On January 23, 2012, the Court denied two related motions to transfer venue to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California (the “Initial Motions”). (Dkt. No.