Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Triton Tech of Texas, LLC v. Nintendo of America Inc. et al, No. 2:10-cv-00328 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 23, 2012)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:10-cv-00328, Dkt. No. 90
Decided
January 23, 2012
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - The Court, therefore, DENIES the Moving Defendants motions to transfer to the Northern District of California (Dkt. Nos. 38 & 44)
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are the Moving Defendants’ 1 motions to transfer venue to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California (Dkt. Nos. 38 & 44). The C ourt, having considered the venue motion s and the arguments of counsel, DENIES the motion s to transfer venue. As will be disc ussed below, the Moving Defendants have not met the threshold burden of showing that the transferee venue is one where this suit could have been brought. See In re Volkswagen of Am., Inc. (“Volkswagen III ”), 566 F.3d 1349 (Fed. Cir.