Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Ameranth, Inc. v. Par Technology Corp et al, No. 2:10-cv-00294 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 10, 2012)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:10-cv-00294, Dkt. No. 169
Decided
August 10, 2012
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Order
Length
22 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

On May 30, 2012, the Court held a hearing to determine the proper construction of the disputed claim terms in U.S. Patent Nos. 6,384,850 and 6,871,325. After considering the arguments made by the parties at the hearing and in the parties’ claim construction briefing (Dkt. Nos. 155, 157, 158 and 160), the Court issues this Claim Construction Memorandum and Order. APPLICABLE LAW “It is a ‘bedrock principle’ of patent law that ‘the claims of a patent define the invention to which the patentee is enti tled the right to exclude.’” Phillips v. AWH Corp.