Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Ameranth, Inc. v. Par Technology Corp et al, No. 2:10-cv-00294 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 19, 2011)

Adopted in Part Report and recommendation adopted with modification
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:10-cv-00294, Dkt. No. 119
Decided
September 19, 2011
Judge
See opinion
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 107 Report and Recommendations, granting in part denying in part 53 Motion to Dismiss filed by Kudzu Interactive, Inc, denying as moot 88 MOTION to Dismiss - Partial filed by Partech, Inc, Par T…
Length
2 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

The above-titled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Chad Everingham pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. The report of the Magist rate Judge (Dkt. No. 107) has been presented for consideration. The report recommends that the court grant defendant Kudzu Interactive, Inc.’s (“Kudzu”) motion to dismiss in part. It is recommended that the court grant the motion with regard to the claims of the patents-in-suit that have been previously-litigated and found invalid.