Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Hitachi Consumer Electronics Co. Ltd. et al v. Top Victory Electronics (Taiwan) Co Ltd et al, No. 2:10-cv-00260 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 18, 2013)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:10-cv-00260, Dkt. No. 383
Decided
September 18, 2013
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER, Denying motions #359 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law Pursuant to Rule 50(B) That the '310 and '375 Patents are Infringed or Alternatively for a New Trial Pursuant to Rule 59(A) filed by Hitachi Advanced …
Length
23 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are the parties’ post-trial motions. Having considered the parties’ written submissions, the Court: (1) DENIES Hitachi’s Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law Pursuant to Rule 50(b) that the ’310 and ’375 Patents are Infringed or, Altern atively, for a New Trial Pursuant to Rule 59(a) (Dkt. No. 359); (2) DENIES Hitachi’s Motion Pursuant to Rule 59 For a New Trial on All Issues Due to Submission of False Testimony and Improper Argument (Dkt. No.