Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Hitachi Consumer Electronics Co. Ltd. et al v. Top Victory Electronics (Taiwan) Co Ltd et al, No. 2:10-cv-00260 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 13, 2012)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:10-cv-00260, Dkt. No. 170
Decided
November 13, 2012
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - The Court adopts the constructions set forth in this opinion for the disputed terms of the patents-in-suit
Length
129 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are Plaintiffs Hitachi Consumer Electronics Co., Ltd., and Hitachi Advanced Digital, Inc.’s (collectively, “Plaintiff’s” or “Hitachi’s”) Opening Brief in Support of Plaintiff’s Claim Constructions (Dkt. No. 137), and exhibits thereto (Dkt. Nos. 138-140), regarding patents asserted by Hitachi.