Intravisual Inc. v. Fujitsu Microelectronics America, Inc., et al, No. 2:10-cv-00090 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 20, 2011)
From the Opinion
The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.
Before the Court are the Moving Defendants‟ 1 motions to transfer venue to the United States District Court for the Southern District of California or the Northern District of California. (Dkt. Nos. 181 & 187.) The Court, having considered the venue motions and the arguments of counsel, DENIES the motions to transfer venue . As will be discussed below, the Moving Defendants have not met the threshold burden of showing that either transferee venue is one where this suit could have been brought. See In re Volkswagen of Am., Inc.
Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error