Intravisual Inc. v. Fujitsu Microelectronics America, Inc., et al, No. 2:10-cv-00090 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 18, 2011)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are Defendants Renesas Elec tronics America Inc.’s (“Renesas America”) and Renesas Electronics Corporation’s (Renesas Electronics”) (collectively “Renesas”) motions to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) (Dkt. Nos. 92 and 140, respectively). In the motions, Renesas argues that Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint’s allegations of direct and indirect infringement fail to meet the pleading requirements set forth in Bell Atlantic Corporation v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 127 S. Ct. 1955, 167 L. Ed.