Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Plant Equipment Inc. v. Intrado Inc., No. 2:09-cv-00395 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 27, 2012)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:09-cv-00395, Dkt. No. 127
Decided
April 27, 2012
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - Plant Claim Construction Order. The Court adopts the constructions set forth in this opinion for the disputed terms of the patent-in-suit. The parties are ordered that they may not refer, directly or indirectl…
Length
27 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the construction of the pa rties’ disputed claims, which the Court has preliminarily addressed in its March 1, 2012 Orde r (Dkt. No. 117) and which preliminary order is superseded by this expanded claim construction opini on and order. The Court will first briefly address the patent-in-suit and then turn to the merits of the claim construction issues. I. BACKGROUND OF THE PATENT-IN-SUIT On December 22, 2009, Plaintiff Plant Equipmen t, Inc. (“Plant”) brought this action against Defendant Intrado, Inc.