Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Plant Equipment Inc. v. Intrado Inc., No. 2:09-cv-00395 (E.D. Tex. June 16, 2010)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:09-cv-00395, Dkt. No. 31
Decided
June 16, 2010
Judge
T. John Ward, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - pending before the court is Dft Intrado Inc Motion to Transfer. The court is of the opinion that the motion should be DENIED
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Pending before the Court is Defe ndant Intrado Inc.’s (“Intrado”) Motion to Transfer This Case to the District of Colorado Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). [Dkt. No. 18] After considering the parties’ arguments and the applicable law, the Court is of the opinion that Intrado’s motion should be DENIED. I. Background Plaintiff Plant Equipment Inc. (“Plant”) f iled this lawsuit on December 22, 2009, accusing Intrado of infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,744,858 (“the ‘858 patent”).