Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Mass Engineered Design, Inc. et al v. 9X Media, Inc. et al, No. 2:09-cv-00358 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 25, 2011)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:09-cv-00358, Dkt. No. 260
Decided
March 25, 2011
Judge
T. John Ward, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - The Court has carefully considered the parties briefs and respective arguments and for the following reasons DENIES 9X Medias motion
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant 9X Media, Inc.‟s (“9x Media”) Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction or in the alternative Motion to Transfer Venue to the Northern District of California. (Dkt. No. 188.) The Court has carefully considered the parties‟ briefs and respective arguments and for the following reasons DENIES 9X Media‟s motion. II. Factual and Procedural Background Plaintiff Mass Engineered Design, Inc. is a corporation orga nized and existing under the laws of the province of Ontario, Canada.