Mass Engineered Design, Inc. et al v. 9X Media, Inc. et al, No. 2:09-cv-00358 (E.D. Tex. July 28, 2010)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Pending before the court is Defendant Wall Street Trading Desks, Inc.’s (“WSTD”) Motion and Memorandum to Dismiss [Dkt. No. 58], Defe ndant Targus, Inc.’s (“Targus”) Motion and Memorandum to Dismiss Under Federal Rule 12(b)(3) [Dkt. No. 98], Defendant Ergotech Group, Inc.’s (“Ergotech”) Motion and Memorandum to Dismiss Under Federal Rule 12(b)(3) [Dkt. No. 106], Defendant Atdec Pty Ltd.’s (“Atdec”) Motion and Memorandum to Dismiss Under Federal Rule 12(b)(3) [Dkt. No.