Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

PalTalk Holdings, Inc. v. Sony Computer Entertainment America, Inc. et al, No. 2:09-cv-00274 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 3, 2010)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:09-cv-00274, Dkt. No. 173
Decided
September 3, 2010
Judge
Charles Everingham IV, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER denying motion to transfer
Length
14 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

I. Background Plaintiff Paltalk brought suit against defendants in September of 2009. Defendants filed the1 present motion seeking a transfer to the Northern District of California in December of 2009. (Dkt. No. 64). Defendants seek transfer on the grounds that the Northern District of California would be clearly more convenient for all parties. Plaintiff opposes. For the reasons stated below, the Defendants’ motion is DENIED. II.