Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

PalTalk Holdings, Inc. v. Sony Computer Entertainment America, Inc. et al, No. 2:09-cv-00274 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 1, 2010)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:09-cv-00274, Dkt. No. 170
Decided
September 1, 2010
Judge
David Folsom, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER; adopting 150 Report and Recommendations,, denying 52 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Sony Corporation, Sony Corporation of America. Accordingly, the plaintiff shall file its amended complaint within ten days
Length
1 page

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

The above-titled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Chad Everingham pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. The report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. No. 150), which contains his recommendation that the court deny the defendants Sony Corporation’s and Sony Corporation of America’s motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 52), and instead treating it as a motion for a more definite statement, has been presented for consideration. No objections were filed to the report and recommendation.