Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Ambato Media, LLC v. Clarion Co., Ltd et al, No. 2:09-cv-00242 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 23, 2012)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:09-cv-00242, Dkt. No. 250
Decided
January 23, 2012
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - For the reasons herein, the Court DENIES Garmins Motion to Stay Proceedings (Dkt. No. 234.)
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Garmin International, Inc.’s (“Garmin”) Motion to Stay Proceedings (Dkt. No. 234.) Having considered the parties’ written submissions, the Court DENIES the Motion. I. Introduction On August 14, 2009, Ambato Media LLC (“Ambato”) filed suit against multiple defendants for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,432,542 (the “‘542 patent”). On February 28, 2011 Garmin International, Inc. (“Garmin”) filed a request for ex parte reexamination of claims 36, 38 and 39 of the ‘542 patent.