Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Ambato Media, LLC v. Clarion Co., Ltd et al, No. 2:09-cv-00242 (E.D. Tex. July 18, 2011)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:09-cv-00242, Dkt. No. 219
Decided
July 18, 2011
Judge
T. John Ward, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - Order addresses the issues raised for claim construction as set forth herein
Length
26 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Plaintiff Ambato Media, LLC (“Ambato” ) filed suit against Defendants Garmin International, Inc., DPH Holdings Corp., and Nextar Inc. (collectively “Defendants”) for patent infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,432,542 („542 Patent). There are four terms in the „542 Patent that the parties dispute for claim construction purposes. This Memorandum Opinion and Order addresses the issues raised for claim construction. I.