Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Adrain v. Genetec Inc et al, No. 2:08-cv-00423 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 22, 2009)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:08-cv-00423, Dkt. No. 78
Decided
September 22, 2009
Judge
Charles Everingham IV, M.J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION - for all the foregoing reasons, the court DENIES the motion to sever and motion to transfer
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION JOHN B. ADRAIN § § vs. § § CASE NO. 2:08-CV-423 GENETEC INC.; PIPS TECHNOLOGY INC.; § ELSAG NORTH AMERICA LLC; § PLATESCAN, INC.; and THE CITY OF § PLANO, TEXAS MEMORANDUM OPINION I. Introduction This case involves alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,831,669 (“the ‘669 patent”), issued to the plaintiff John B. Adrain. Currently pending before the court is the defendant Elsag North America LLC’s (“Elsag”) motion to sever Elsag and transfer venue (Dkt. No. 44).