Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Financial Sytems Technology (Intellectual Property) Pty. Ltd. et al v. Oracle Corporation, No. 2:08-cv-00371 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 3, 2010)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:08-cv-00371, Dkt. No. 74
Decided
August 3, 2010
Judge
Charles Everingham IV, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER denying motion for reconsideration on Oracle's motion to transfer
Length
8 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

The above-titled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Chad Everingham pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. The underlying mo tion in dispute is a motion to change venue pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) filed by Oracle Corporation (“Oracle”) on June 4, 2009. (Dkt. No. 19.) On December 8, 2009, Magistrate Judge Everingham denied Oracle’s motion to transfer. (Dkt. No. 27.) On December 28, 2009, Oracle filed a motion for reconsideration (Dkt. No. 29) to which the pa rties continued to brief through February 2010.