Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Financial Sytems Technology (Intellectual Property) Pty. Ltd. et al v. Oracle Corporation, No. 2:08-cv-00371 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 8, 2009)

Denied
Venue / Transfer
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:08-cv-00371, Dkt. No. 27
Decided
December 8, 2009
Judge
Charles Everingham IV, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION AND ORDER - before the court is Dft Oracle Corporations motion for change of venue from the Eastern District of Texas to the Northern District of California. For the following reasons heren, the motion is DENIED
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is defendant Oracle Corpor ation’s (“Oracle’s”) motion for change of venue pursuant to 28 U.S.C § 1404(a) from the Easter n District of Texas to the Northern District of California. (Dkt. No 19.) For the following reasons, the motion is DENIED.1 I. INTRODUCTION Financial Systems Technology (Intellectual Pr operty) Pty. Ltd. and Financial Systems Technology Pty. Ltd. (collectively “FST” or “Plainti ffs”) filed a prior laws uit against Oracle in this District on October 12, 2004 (Civ. Actio n No.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case