Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Key Energy Services, Inc. v. C.C. Forbes, LLC et al, No. 2:08-cv-00346 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 28, 2010)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:08-cv-00346, Dkt. No. 121
Decided
September 28, 2010
Judge
David Folsom, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER; adopting 115 Report and Recommendations, 67 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Petron Industries Inc., denying 67 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Petron Industries Inc
Length
1 page

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

The above-titled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Chad Everingham pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. The report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. No. 115), which recommends denying defendant Petr on’s motion for summary judgement without prejudice to refiling after fact discovery is conc luded, has been presented for consideration. The plaintiff did not file an objection to the report and recommendation. The court is of the opinion that the conclu sions of the Magistrate Judge are correct.