Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Key Energy Services, Inc. v. C.C. Forbes, LLC et al, No. 2:08-cv-00346 (E.D. Tex. July 7, 2010)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:08-cv-00346, Dkt. No. 100
Decided
July 7, 2010
Judge
Charles Everingham IV, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - the court issues the following order concerning the claim construction issues
Length
22 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

After considering the submissions and the arguments of counsel, the court issues the following order concerning the claim construction issues: I. Introduction In this case, the plaintiff Key Energy Services, Inc. (“Key”) contends that the defendants C.C. Forbes, LLC (“Forbes”) and Petron Industries Inc. (“Petron”) infringe various claims of United States Patent Nos. 6,079,490 (“the ‘490 patent”) and 7,006,920 (“the ‘920 patent”). This memorandum addresses the parties’ various claim construction disputes.