Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Aerielle Technologies, Inc. et al v. Procare International, Inc., No. 2:08-cv-00284 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 1, 2011)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:08-cv-00284, Dkt. No. 29
Decided
March 1, 2011
Judge
T. John Ward, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - motion for a permanent injunction is granted
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiff s Aerielle Technologies, Inc.‟s, and Aerielle, Inc.‟s (collectively “Aerielle”) M otion for Permanent Injunction ( Dkt. No. 22) and Amended Motion for Permanent Injunction (Dkt. No. 25). The Court held an evidentiary hearing on the issue of a permanent injunction on February 17 , 20 11. Defendant Procare International Co. (“Procare”) did not file an opposition to the Motion and was not represented by counsel at the hearing. The Court has ca refully considered the submissions, the record, and the applicable law.