Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Aerielle Technologies, Inc. et al v. Procare International, Inc., No. 2:08-cv-00284 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 28, 2011)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:08-cv-00284, Dkt. No. 28
Decided
February 28, 2011
Judge
T. John Ward, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - granting Aerielle's motion to amend motion for entry of default as to deft Procare International Inc
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff s Aerielle Technologies, Inc.‟s and Aerielle, Inc.‟s (collectively “Aerielle”) Amended Motion for Entry of Default (Dkt. No. 26). O n August 2 4, 2009, at the request of c ounsel, the Court entered a default of Procare International, Inc. (Dkt. No. 16.) In the current motion, Aerielle ask the Court to “clarify that it is the properly named Procare International Co.