Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

eTool Development, Inc. et al v. National Semiconductor Corporation, No. 2:08-cv-00196 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 13, 2011)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:08-cv-00196, Dkt. No. 175
Decided
September 13, 2011
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER Agreed contruction from the '911 Patent. The parties have agreed to the following constructions, and the Court adopts these constructions as the construction of the Court. Claim Term/Phrase Agreed Construction s…
Length
31 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

In the underlying lawsuit, eTool Development, Inc. and eTool Patent Holdings Corporation (hereinafter “eTool” or “Plaintiff”) sue Defendant National Semiconductor Corporation (“National”) for patent i nfringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,113,919 („919 Patent). The parties dispute eight terms in the „919 Patent for claim construction purposes. Further, within those eight terms, there are two terms that National argues are indefinite. The Court held a hear ing regarding claim construction at 9:00 a.m. on Wednesday, August 17, 2011.