Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

eTool Development, Inc. et al v. National Semiconductor Corporation, No. 2:08-cv-00196 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 15, 2010)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:08-cv-00196, Dkt. No. 84
Decided
March 15, 2010
Judge
T. John Ward, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER denying #60 motion to transfer venue
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Pending before the Court is Defendant Nati onal Semiconductor Corporation’s (“National”) Motion to Transfer Venue to the Northern Dist rict of California. [Dkt. No. 80] After considering the parties’ arguments and the app licable law, the Court is of the opinion that National’s motion should be DENIED. I. Background Plaintiffs eTool Development, Inc. and eTool Patent Holdings Corp. (collectively “eTool”) filed this lawsuit on May 9, 2008, asserting infringement of U.S. Patent No.