Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics Inc vs Wyeth et al, No. 2:08-cv-00067 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 2, 2011)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:08-cv-00067, Dkt. No. 268
Decided
September 2, 2011
Judge
Charles Everingham IV, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - denying defendants Wyeths and Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'s Motion for Reconsideration. (Dkt. No. 219.)
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants Wyeth‟s and Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc.‟s (collectively “Wyeth”) Motion for Reconsideration. (Dkt. No. 219.) For t he following reasons, Wyeth ‟s motion is DENIED. Plaintiff Novart is Vaccines and Diagnostics, Inc. (“Novartis” ) filed suit against Wyeth for patent infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,228,620 ( “the „620 Patent”). The Court issued a Memorandum Opinion and Order on April 26, 2011 that outlined the Court‟s claim constructions for the various disputed claim terms.