Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics Inc vs Wyeth et al, No. 2:08-cv-00067 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 31, 2010)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:08-cv-00067, Dkt. No. 138
Decided
March 31, 2010
Judge
Charles Everingham IV, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - Order denying motion to transfer venue #66
Length
9 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Pending before the Court is Defendants Wyeth and Wyeth Pharmaceuticals Inc.’s (collectively “Wyeth”) Motion to Transfer Venue to the Northern District of California. [Dkt. No. 66] After consideri ng the parties’ arguments and the app licable law, the Court is of the opinion that Wyeth’s motion should be DENIED. I. Background Plaintiff Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics, Inc. (“Novartis”) filed this lawsuit on February 15, 2008, asserting infringement of U.S. Patent Nos.