Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Software Rights Archive, LLC v. Google Inc. et al, No. 2:07-cv-00511 (E.D. Tex. June 24, 2009)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:07-cv-00511, Dkt. No. 154
Decided
June 24, 2009
Judge
Charles Everingham IV, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - denying 147 motion for certification of order for interlocutory appeal or in the alternative for reconsideration
Length
8 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

I. Introduction Pending before the court is the defendant s’ motion for certification of order for interlocutory appeal or, in the alternative, for reconsideration (Dkt. No. 147). For the reasons discussed below, the court denies the motion. II. Factual and Procedural Background On March 31, 2009, the court entered an orde r (Dkt. No. 138), denying the defendants’, Google Inc. (“Google”), Yahoo! Inc. (“Yahoo”), IAC Search & Media, Inc. (“IAC”), and Lycos, Inc.