Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Software Rights Archive, LLC v. Google Inc. et al, No. 2:07-cv-00511 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 31, 2009)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:07-cv-00511, Dkt. No. 138
Decided
March 31, 2009
Judge
Charles Everingham IV, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - Denying deft's motion to dismiss #66
Length
12 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

I. Introduction Pending before the court is the defendants’ motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 66). Google Inc. (“Google”), Yahoo! Inc. (“Yahoo ”), IAC Search & Media, Inc. (“IAC”), and Lycos, Inc. (“Lycos”) (collectively, “the defendants”) seek to dismiss this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Federal Rule of Civi l Procedure 12(b)(1).