Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

IP Innovation LLC et al v. Google, Inc., No. 2:07-cv-00503 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 7, 2010)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:07-cv-00503, Dkt. No. 102
Decided
January 7, 2010
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - the Court interprets the claim language in this case in the manner set forth above. For ease of reference, the Courts claim interpretations are set forth in Appendix A
Length
33 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION IP INNOVATION, LLC and TECHNOLOGY LICENSING CORPORATION Plaintiffs vs. GOOGLE, INC. Defendant § § § § § CASE NO. 2:07 CV 503 § PATENT CASE § § § § § § § MEMORANDUM OPINION This Memorandum Opinion construes the Patents-in-Suit: U.S. Patent Nos. 5,675,819 (the “’819 Patent”) and 5,276,785 (the “’785 Patent”). BACKGROUND Plaintiffs IP Innovation, LLC and Technology Licensing Corporation (“IPI”) allege that Defendant Google, Inc.