Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

IP Innovation LLC et al v. Google, Inc., No. 2:07-cv-00503 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 21, 2009)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:07-cv-00503, Dkt. No. 80
Decided
September 21, 2009
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 50 Sealed Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Standing
Length
12 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Goog le, Inc.’s (“Google”) Motion to Dismiss for L ack of Standing (Docket No. 50). Having considered the parties’ oral arguments and written submissions, the Motion is DENIED. BACKGROUND IP Innovation L.L.C. (“IPI”) and Technology Licensing Corporation (“TLC”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) acquired rights in eleven patents, including U.S. Patent Nos. 5,675,819 and 5,276,785 (collectively, “the patents-in-suit”), from Xerox Corporation (“Xerox”) through a settlement of a separate patent dispute between Plaintiffs and Xerox.