Microlinc, LLC v. Intel Corporation et al, No. 2:07-cv-00488 (E.D. Tex. June 7, 2013)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This claim construction orde r construes the disputed clai m terms of U.S. Patent No. 6,009,488 (’488 Patent) entitled “Computer Having P acket-Based Interconnect Channel.” On May 16, 2013, the Court held a claim construction hearing to construe the disputed terms. For the following reasons, the Court a dopts the constructions set forth below. See also Appendix A. I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND The procedural background for this case is atypical. It involves two lawsuits, four ex parte reexaminations of the asserted patent by the U.S.