Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Microlinc, LLC v. Intel Corporation et al, No. 2:07-cv-00488 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 20, 2010)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:07-cv-00488, Dkt. No. 374
Decided
September 20, 2010
Judge
T. John Ward, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - The Courts grants Defendants Motion to Stay in Light of Final Rejection of All Claims of the Patent-in-Suit (the Motion). (Dkt. No. 314.)
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants‟ Motion to Stay in Light of Final Rejection of All Claims of the Patent -in-Suit (the “Motion”). (Dkt. No. 314.) The Motion is submitted on behalf of all Defendants. Defendants ask this Court to stay this litigation pending the r eexamination proceedings before the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) in light of a “final rejection” on May 26, 2010 of all the claims in the patent-in-suit, U.S. Patent No. 6,009,488 (filed Nov. 7, 1997) (the „488 patent) .