Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

WI-Lan, Inc. v. Acer, Inc. et al, No. 2:07-cv-00473 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 30, 2010)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:07-cv-00473, Dkt. No. 988
Decided
December 30, 2010
Judge
T. John Ward, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - Plaintiffs motion for clarification, (Dkt. No 870, 875), is GRANTED as a motion for reconsideration
Length
11 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiff‟s motion for clarification of Court‟s construction of the term “electromagnetic signals having amplitude and phase characteristics .” (Dkt. No. 870, 875 .) Defendants oppose this motion. (Dkt. No 925 .) For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff‟s Motion as a motion for reconsideration. I. BACKGROUND This Court issued a claim construction order on May 11, 2010 construing certain terms of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,282,222 (“the „222 patent”) and RE37,802 (“the „802 patent”). (See Dkt. No.