WI-Lan, Inc. v. Acer, Inc. et al, No. 2:07-cv-00473 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 18, 2010)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Pending before the Court are Defendant Broa dcom Corporation’s (“Broadcom”) Motion to Compel Plaintiff Wi-LAN, Inc. (“Wi-LAN”) to Produce Relevant Documents (Dkt. No. 492) and Defendants’ Motion to Compel Production of Documents (Dkt. No. 493). In its motion (Dkt. No. 492), Broadcom moves for the produc tion of a report written by Dr. Peter Driessen (the “Driessen Report”) and other documents di sclosed to Broadcom’s attorneys during due diligence of a potential purchase of certain Wi-L AN intellectual property interests in late 2005 and early 2006.