Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Bright Response LLC v. Google Inc et al, No. 2:07-cv-00371 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 2, 2010)

Granted in Part
Summary Judgment Invalidity (§ 102/§ 103) Prosecution History Estoppel
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:07-cv-00371, Dkt. No. 586
Decided
August 2, 2010
Judge
Charles Everingham IV, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER granting in part and denying in part pltf's motion and denying deft's motion
Length
19 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

I. Introduction Both the plaintiff and the defendants in the above-referenced case moved for summary judgment on Defendants’ affirmative defenses and counterclaims of invalidity under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102(b), (e), and 103(a). (Dkt. Nos. 389, 390, 391, 392). Plaintiff Bright Response (“Plaintiff”)1 additionally moved for summary judgment on Defendants’ remaining affirmative defenses and counterclaims.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case