Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Bright Response LLC v. Google Inc et al, No. 2:07-cv-00371 (E.D. Tex. June 18, 2010)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:07-cv-00371, Dkt. No. 369
Decided
June 18, 2010
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER concerning the claim construction issues. The court adopts the constructions set forth in this opinion for the disputed terms of the 947 patent. The parties are ordered that they may not refer, directly or indir…
Length
18 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

After considering the submissions and the arguments of counsel, the court issues the following order concerning the claim construction issues: I. Introduction In this case, the plaintiff Bright Response, LLC (“Bright Response”) contends that the defendants Yahoo! Inc. (“Yahoo”), Google Inc. (“Google”), and AOL LLC (“AOL”) infringe various claims of United States Patent No. 6,411,947 B2 (“the ‘947 patent”). Bright Response asserts claims 26-28, 30, 31, 33, and 38-40 against Google and AOL and asserts claims 26, 27, and 38-40 against Yahoo.