Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Function Media, L.L.C. v. Google, Inc. et al, No. 2:07-cv-00279 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 9, 2009)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:07-cv-00279, Dkt. No. 218
Decided
October 9, 2009
Judge
Charles Everingham IV, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER regarding the claim construction issues
Length
23 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

After considering the submissions and the arguments of counsel, the court issues the following order concerning the claim construction issues: I. Introduction The plaintiff Function Media, L.L.C. (“FM”) alleges the defendant Google, Inc. (“Google”) infringes three of its patents: U.S. Patent Nos. 6,446,045 B1 (“the ‘045 patent”), 7,240,025 B2 (“the ‘025 patent”), and 7,249,059 B2 (“the ‘059 patent”). The ‘025 patent is a continuation of the ‘045 patent, and the ‘059 patent is a continuation-in-part of the ‘045 patent.