Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

PureChoice, Inc., v. Honeywell International, Inc.,, No. 2:06-cv-00244 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 22, 2008)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:06-cv-00244, Dkt. No. 91
Decided
January 22, 2008
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION AND ORDER - the court issues the following order concerning the claim construction issues. In view of the court's reasoning, asserted independent claims 1, 6, 21 and 62 are invalid as indefinite. The defendant is to s…
Length
13 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

After considering the submissions and the arg uments of counse l, the Court i ssues the following order concerning the claim construction issues: I. Introduction Plaintiff PureChoice, Inc. (“PureChoice”) accuses Defendant Honeywell International, Inc. (“Honeywell”) of infring ing claims of United States Reissued Patent No. RE38,985 (“ the ‘985 patent”). The ‘985 patent is a reissue of USPN 5,892,690 (“the ‘690 patent”), which was filed on March 10, 1997.