Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

PureChoice, Inc., v. Honeywell International, Inc.,, No. 2:06-cv-00244 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 20, 2007)

Denied
IPR / PTAB
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:06-cv-00244, Dkt. No. 41
Decided
April 20, 2007
Judge
T. John Ward, J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER - the court has considered the competing interests and concludes that the interest in proceeding with this case outweights any benefits from staying this case. Accordingly, the court exercises its discretion and Denies the …
Length
3 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Honeywell International, Inc.’s Motion to Stay (#22). After considering the parties’ written submissions, the motion is DENIED. I. Introduction Plaintiff PureChoice, I nc. (“PureChoice) filed suit on J une 15, 2006, ag ainst Defendant Honeywell International, Inc.’s (“Honeywell”) for infringement of U.S. Patent No. RE 38,985 E (“the “‘985 patent”) entitled “Environment Monitoring System.” The ‘985 patent is a reissue of U.S. Patent No. 5,892,690.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case