Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Visto Corporation v. Research In Motion Limited et al, No. 2:06-cv-00181 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 30, 2008)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:06-cv-00181, Dkt. No. 198
Decided
April 30, 2008
Judge
Charles Everingham IV, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - This opinion and order resolves the material claim construction disputes between the parties - findings set forth herein
Length
39 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

1. Introduction In this case, Visto Corporation (“Visto”) contends that the defendants, Research in Motion, Limited, and Research in Motion Corporation (collectively “RIM”) infringe various claims of five United States patents, and RIM contends that Visto infringes various claims of two United States patents. In this regard, Visto is asserting U.S. Patent Nos.