Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Visto Corporation v. Research In Motion Limited et al, No. 2:06-cv-00181 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 28, 2007)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:06-cv-00181, Dkt. No. 120
Decided
September 28, 2007
Judge
Charles Everingham IV, J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION - denying #45 motion to stay pending reexamination
Length
3 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Pending before the court is the defendants’ motion (#45) to stay the case pending ex parte patent reexamination proceedings. For the reasons discussed below, the court denies the defendants’ motion. 1. Introduction Visto Corp. (“Visto”) filed suit on April 28, 2006, against the defendants Research in Motion Ltd. and Research in Motion Corp. (collectively, “RIM”) for infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,023,708 (“the ‘708 patent”), 6,085,1921 (“the ‘192 patent”), 6,151,606 (“the ‘606 patent”), and 6,708,221 (“the ‘221 patent”).