Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Litepanels, LLC et al v. VFGadgets Inc., No. 2:06-cv-00167 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 6, 2007)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:06-cv-00167, Dkt. No. 117
Decided
December 6, 2007
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - the Court interprets the claim language in this case in the manner set forth above. For ease of reference, the Court's claim interpretations are set forth in a table as Appendix B. The claims with the disputed…
Length
15 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION LITEPANELS, LLC and LITEPANELS, INC. Plaintiffs vs. GEKKO TECHNOLOGY, LTD. Defendant § § § § § CASE NO. 2:06-CV-167 § PATENT CASE § § § § MEMORANDUM OPINION This Memorandum Opinion construes the terms in United States Patent Nos. 6,749,310 (the “‘310 patent”); 6,948,823 (the “‘823 patent”); and 7,163,302 (the “‘302 patent”). BACKGROUND The pa tents-in-suit deal with illum ination technolog y for the f ilm, commercial, a nd photographic ind ustries.