Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Litepanels, LLC et al v. VFGadgets Inc., No. 2:06-cv-00167 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 20, 2006)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:06-cv-00167, Dkt. No. 28
Decided
November 20, 2006
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER denying deft Gekko's motion for reconsideration
Length
2 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Gekko Technology, Ltd.’s (“Gekko”) Motion to Reconsider its Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 19). For the foregoing reasons, the Court DENIES the motion. Plaintiffs Litepanels, LLC and L itepanels, Inc. (“Litepanels”) filed their First Amende d Complaint on April 21, 2006 alleging that Gekko violated U.S. Patent Nos. 6,749,310 (“the ‘310 patent”) and 6,948,823 (“the ‘823 patent’). These patents relate to wide area lighting effects systems, and the a lleged infringing products are lighting systems used in film and video.