Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

DDR Holdings, LLC v. Hotels.com et al, No. 2:06-cv-00042 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 3, 2012)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:06-cv-00042, Dkt. No. 500
Decided
October 3, 2012
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - Denying Defts 401 MOTION for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement filed by Digital River, Inc
Length
10 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Digital River, Inc.’s (“Digital River”) Motion for Summary Judgment of Non -Infringement. (Dkt. No. 401 .) After carefully considering the parties’ written submissions, the Motion is DENIED. I. BACKGROUND On January 31, 2006, DDR Holdings, LLC (“DDR”) brought this suit against various Defendants, including Digital River, alleging infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,629,135 (“the ‘135 patent”), 6,993,572 (“the ‘572 patent”) and 7,818,399 (“the ‘399 patent”), which relate to e- commerce outsourcing.