Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

DDR Holdings, LLC v. Hotels.com et al, No. 2:06-cv-00042 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 28, 2012)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:06-cv-00042, Dkt. No. 495
Decided
September 28, 2012
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
8 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants’ 1 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Non - Infringement of Claim 8 of the ‘135 Patent. (Dkt. No. 402.) After carefully considering the parties’ written submissions, the Motion is DENIED. I. BACKGROUND On January 31, 2006, DDR brought this su it against various Defendants alleging infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,629,136 (“the ‘136 patent”), 6,993,572 (“the ‘572 patent”) and 7,818,399 (“the ‘399 patent”), which relate to e -commerce outsourcing.