Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Visto Corporation v. Good Technology, Inc., No. 2:06-cv-00039 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 16, 2008)

Claims Construed
Claim Construction
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:06-cv-00039, Dkt. No. 122
Decided
January 16, 2008
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - The court adopts the above constructions. The parties are ordered that they may not refer, directly or indirectly, to each others claim construction positions in the presence of the jury. Parties are ordered t…
Length
24 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

1. Introduction . In this case, Visto contends that Good infringes various claims of four United States patents. The patents-in-suit include U.S. Patent Nos. 6,085,192,1 6,708,221, 6,151,606, and 7,039,679. This opinion and order resolves the material claim construction disputes between the parties. 2. Description of the Procedural History of the Patents and the Technology. The patents-in-suit are related to one another, and are directed to data synchronization methods and systems.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case