Visto Corporation v. Good Technology, Inc., No. 2:06-cv-00039 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 27, 2007)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the court is the defendant’s motion (#27) to stay the case pending ex parte reexamination. For the reasons described below, the court denies the defendant’s motion (#27) to stay. 1. Introduction Visto Corp. (“Visto”) filed suit on January 30, 2006, against the defendant Good Technology, Inc. (“Good”) for infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,085,192 1 (“the ‘192 patent”), 6,151,606 (“the ‘606 patent”), 6,708,221 (“the ‘221 patent”), and 7,039,679 (“the ‘679 patent”) (collectively, “the patents-in-suit”).