Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Saffran, M.D., Ph.D., v. Boston Scientific Corporation,, No. 2:05-cv-00547 (E.D. Tex. July 9, 2008)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:05-cv-00547, Dkt. No. 196
Decided
July 9, 2008
Judge
T. John Ward, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER denying #181 motion for a new trial on all issues
Length
17 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

I. Introduction The court DENIES Boston Scientific Corporation’s (“BSC”) Alternative Motion for a New Trial on All Issues (#181) (the “Motion”) for the following reasons: I. Facts and Procedural Background. Bruce N. Saffran, Ph.D., M.D., (“Saffran”) filed this suit on December 16, 2005. Pursuant to the L ocal Rul es, BSC filed its I nvalidity Contentions on Decembe r 4, 2006. The pa rties exchanged their claim construction positions on March 28, 2007 and submitted their joint claim construction and pre-hearing statement to the court on June 15, 2007.