Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Saffran, M.D., Ph.D., v. Boston Scientific Corporation,, No. 2:05-cv-00547 (E.D. Tex. July 9, 2008)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:05-cv-00547, Dkt. No. 194
Decided
July 9, 2008
Judge
T. John Ward, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER denying #182 motion for a new trial on damages
Length
8 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

I. Introduction The court DENIES Boston Scientific Corporation’s (“BSC”) Alternative Motion for a New Trial on Damages (#182). II. Factual Background and Procedural Posture The court incorporates by reference its orders denying BSC’s Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law (#180) and BSC’s Alternative Motion for a New Trial (#181). Those orders recite the factual background and procedural history of this case, so the court will not reiterate the facts and history of the case. III.